ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Report of Referee:
Reference Number:

Title:

Authors:



I. General Evaluation. Please explain any "No" answers.

A. Is the title appropriate?


B. Is the abstract satisfactory?


C. Are the keywords well chosen?


D. Content

1. Does the paper have enough originality and importance to merit
   publication?

2. Are the ideas, algorithms, results or studies technologically and
   methodologically sound?

3. Are the references to earlier work adequate? If not, please indicate
   additional references that would be appropriate.


E. Presentation

1. Is the paper well organized?

2. Is too much, too little or appropriate material included?

3. Is the presentation clear?

4. Is the English satisfactory?



II. Recommendation
   __ Accept as is
   __ Accept with minor revision (no additional review necessary)
   __ Reconsider after changes (additional review necessary)
   __ Reject
   __ Submit elsewhere



III. Detailed Review

(It is very important to the editors and the authors that you provide a
full account of your evaluation and recommendation. These reviews are a
significant and often overlooked contribution to the scientific process.)